Review





Similar Products

99
Thermo Fisher seqed dna sequence editor
Seqed Dna Sequence Editor, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/seqed dna sequence editor/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
seqed dna sequence editor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InforMax Inc dna sequences editor contigexpress
Dna Sequences Editor Contigexpress, supplied by InforMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dna sequences editor contigexpress/product/InforMax Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dna sequences editor contigexpress - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Benchling Inc dna editor with single guide option, 20-nt length, pam sequence (ngg)
Dna Editor With Single Guide Option, 20 Nt Length, Pam Sequence (Ngg), supplied by Benchling Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dna editor with single guide option, 20-nt length, pam sequence (ngg)/product/Benchling Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dna editor with single guide option, 20-nt length, pam sequence (ngg) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bioedit Company dna sequence alignment editor
Dna Sequence Alignment Editor, supplied by Bioedit Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dna sequence alignment editor/product/Bioedit Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dna sequence alignment editor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Benchling Inc dna sequence editor
(A) Adaptable platform to integrate libraries of multiple <t>DNA-barcoded</t> templates into a specified genomic target and dissect human T cell behavior ex vivo or in vivo with phenotypic screens or single-cell transcriptome analysis. (B) Strategy for selective amplification and sequencing of successful on-target knock-in DNA construct barcodes. A short region of DNA mismatches is introduced into one homology arm of the HDR templates. The on-target HDR knock-ins that have both primer binding sites will be selectively amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA) or cDNA (Figures S2A). (C) Percent of amplicon sequencing reads with GFP or RFP barcodes in the indicated sorted populations 7 days after pooled knock-in of a barcoded two-member library with each construct encoding the same TCR specificity (NY-ESO-1 1G4 clone) plus a distinct additional insert (GFP or RFP) and corresponding DNA barcode. (D) Calculation of knock-in multiplicity in individual cells based on dual GFP / RFP 2-member library knock-in experiments (Figure S2C–E). The predicted percentage (right) of cells with biallelic integrations is estimated to be twice the observed percentage (left) of dual GFP+RFP+ cells as GFP+GFP+ and RFP+RFP+ biallelic cells would be observed in single positive gates. (E) Quantification of template switching in pooled knock-in experiments. The frequency of template switching at each stage of the protocol (left panel) was estimated by sorting single positive populations of T cells edited with the 2-member barcoded library (NY-ESO-1 TCR+GFP and NY-ESO-1 TCR+RFP) and using the homology arm mismatch priming strategy to selectively amplify the barcodes of on-target integrations. The predicted frequency of template switching in an arbitrarily large N-member library (N>2) can be calculated from the observed template switching for a 2-member library (STAR Methods). The pooled electroporation condition (bold) was used for subsequent pooled knock-in screens. n=2 (C–E) individual healthy human donors. See also <t>Figure</t> <t>S1–S2</t> and Table S1
Dna Sequence Editor, supplied by Benchling Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dna sequence editor/product/Benchling Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dna sequence editor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bioedit Company dna sequence alignment editor v7.0 5.3
(A) Adaptable platform to integrate libraries of multiple <t>DNA-barcoded</t> templates into a specified genomic target and dissect human T cell behavior ex vivo or in vivo with phenotypic screens or single-cell transcriptome analysis. (B) Strategy for selective amplification and sequencing of successful on-target knock-in DNA construct barcodes. A short region of DNA mismatches is introduced into one homology arm of the HDR templates. The on-target HDR knock-ins that have both primer binding sites will be selectively amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA) or cDNA (Figures S2A). (C) Percent of amplicon sequencing reads with GFP or RFP barcodes in the indicated sorted populations 7 days after pooled knock-in of a barcoded two-member library with each construct encoding the same TCR specificity (NY-ESO-1 1G4 clone) plus a distinct additional insert (GFP or RFP) and corresponding DNA barcode. (D) Calculation of knock-in multiplicity in individual cells based on dual GFP / RFP 2-member library knock-in experiments (Figure S2C–E). The predicted percentage (right) of cells with biallelic integrations is estimated to be twice the observed percentage (left) of dual GFP+RFP+ cells as GFP+GFP+ and RFP+RFP+ biallelic cells would be observed in single positive gates. (E) Quantification of template switching in pooled knock-in experiments. The frequency of template switching at each stage of the protocol (left panel) was estimated by sorting single positive populations of T cells edited with the 2-member barcoded library (NY-ESO-1 TCR+GFP and NY-ESO-1 TCR+RFP) and using the homology arm mismatch priming strategy to selectively amplify the barcodes of on-target integrations. The predicted frequency of template switching in an arbitrarily large N-member library (N>2) can be calculated from the observed template switching for a 2-member library (STAR Methods). The pooled electroporation condition (bold) was used for subsequent pooled knock-in screens. n=2 (C–E) individual healthy human donors. See also <t>Figure</t> <t>S1–S2</t> and Table S1
Dna Sequence Alignment Editor V7.0 5.3, supplied by Bioedit Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dna sequence alignment editor v7.0 5.3/product/Bioedit Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dna sequence alignment editor v7.0 5.3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bioedit Company automated dna sequencer bioedit sequence alignment editor v7.2.6.1
(A) Adaptable platform to integrate libraries of multiple <t>DNA-barcoded</t> templates into a specified genomic target and dissect human T cell behavior ex vivo or in vivo with phenotypic screens or single-cell transcriptome analysis. (B) Strategy for selective amplification and sequencing of successful on-target knock-in DNA construct barcodes. A short region of DNA mismatches is introduced into one homology arm of the HDR templates. The on-target HDR knock-ins that have both primer binding sites will be selectively amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA) or cDNA (Figures S2A). (C) Percent of amplicon sequencing reads with GFP or RFP barcodes in the indicated sorted populations 7 days after pooled knock-in of a barcoded two-member library with each construct encoding the same TCR specificity (NY-ESO-1 1G4 clone) plus a distinct additional insert (GFP or RFP) and corresponding DNA barcode. (D) Calculation of knock-in multiplicity in individual cells based on dual GFP / RFP 2-member library knock-in experiments (Figure S2C–E). The predicted percentage (right) of cells with biallelic integrations is estimated to be twice the observed percentage (left) of dual GFP+RFP+ cells as GFP+GFP+ and RFP+RFP+ biallelic cells would be observed in single positive gates. (E) Quantification of template switching in pooled knock-in experiments. The frequency of template switching at each stage of the protocol (left panel) was estimated by sorting single positive populations of T cells edited with the 2-member barcoded library (NY-ESO-1 TCR+GFP and NY-ESO-1 TCR+RFP) and using the homology arm mismatch priming strategy to selectively amplify the barcodes of on-target integrations. The predicted frequency of template switching in an arbitrarily large N-member library (N>2) can be calculated from the observed template switching for a 2-member library (STAR Methods). The pooled electroporation condition (bold) was used for subsequent pooled knock-in screens. n=2 (C–E) individual healthy human donors. See also <t>Figure</t> <t>S1–S2</t> and Table S1
Automated Dna Sequencer Bioedit Sequence Alignment Editor V7.2.6.1, supplied by Bioedit Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/automated dna sequencer bioedit sequence alignment editor v7.2.6.1/product/Bioedit Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
automated dna sequencer bioedit sequence alignment editor v7.2.6.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bioedit Company dna sequence data editor
(A) Adaptable platform to integrate libraries of multiple <t>DNA-barcoded</t> templates into a specified genomic target and dissect human T cell behavior ex vivo or in vivo with phenotypic screens or single-cell transcriptome analysis. (B) Strategy for selective amplification and sequencing of successful on-target knock-in DNA construct barcodes. A short region of DNA mismatches is introduced into one homology arm of the HDR templates. The on-target HDR knock-ins that have both primer binding sites will be selectively amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA) or cDNA (Figures S2A). (C) Percent of amplicon sequencing reads with GFP or RFP barcodes in the indicated sorted populations 7 days after pooled knock-in of a barcoded two-member library with each construct encoding the same TCR specificity (NY-ESO-1 1G4 clone) plus a distinct additional insert (GFP or RFP) and corresponding DNA barcode. (D) Calculation of knock-in multiplicity in individual cells based on dual GFP / RFP 2-member library knock-in experiments (Figure S2C–E). The predicted percentage (right) of cells with biallelic integrations is estimated to be twice the observed percentage (left) of dual GFP+RFP+ cells as GFP+GFP+ and RFP+RFP+ biallelic cells would be observed in single positive gates. (E) Quantification of template switching in pooled knock-in experiments. The frequency of template switching at each stage of the protocol (left panel) was estimated by sorting single positive populations of T cells edited with the 2-member barcoded library (NY-ESO-1 TCR+GFP and NY-ESO-1 TCR+RFP) and using the homology arm mismatch priming strategy to selectively amplify the barcodes of on-target integrations. The predicted frequency of template switching in an arbitrarily large N-member library (N>2) can be calculated from the observed template switching for a 2-member library (STAR Methods). The pooled electroporation condition (bold) was used for subsequent pooled knock-in screens. n=2 (C–E) individual healthy human donors. See also <t>Figure</t> <t>S1–S2</t> and Table S1
Dna Sequence Data Editor, supplied by Bioedit Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dna sequence data editor/product/Bioedit Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dna sequence data editor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Adaptable platform to integrate libraries of multiple DNA-barcoded templates into a specified genomic target and dissect human T cell behavior ex vivo or in vivo with phenotypic screens or single-cell transcriptome analysis. (B) Strategy for selective amplification and sequencing of successful on-target knock-in DNA construct barcodes. A short region of DNA mismatches is introduced into one homology arm of the HDR templates. The on-target HDR knock-ins that have both primer binding sites will be selectively amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA) or cDNA (Figures S2A). (C) Percent of amplicon sequencing reads with GFP or RFP barcodes in the indicated sorted populations 7 days after pooled knock-in of a barcoded two-member library with each construct encoding the same TCR specificity (NY-ESO-1 1G4 clone) plus a distinct additional insert (GFP or RFP) and corresponding DNA barcode. (D) Calculation of knock-in multiplicity in individual cells based on dual GFP / RFP 2-member library knock-in experiments (Figure S2C–E). The predicted percentage (right) of cells with biallelic integrations is estimated to be twice the observed percentage (left) of dual GFP+RFP+ cells as GFP+GFP+ and RFP+RFP+ biallelic cells would be observed in single positive gates. (E) Quantification of template switching in pooled knock-in experiments. The frequency of template switching at each stage of the protocol (left panel) was estimated by sorting single positive populations of T cells edited with the 2-member barcoded library (NY-ESO-1 TCR+GFP and NY-ESO-1 TCR+RFP) and using the homology arm mismatch priming strategy to selectively amplify the barcodes of on-target integrations. The predicted frequency of template switching in an arbitrarily large N-member library (N>2) can be calculated from the observed template switching for a 2-member library (STAR Methods). The pooled electroporation condition (bold) was used for subsequent pooled knock-in screens. n=2 (C–E) individual healthy human donors. See also Figure S1–S2 and Table S1

Journal: Cell

Article Title: Pooled Knock-In Targeting for Genome Engineering of Cellular Immunotherapies

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.039

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Adaptable platform to integrate libraries of multiple DNA-barcoded templates into a specified genomic target and dissect human T cell behavior ex vivo or in vivo with phenotypic screens or single-cell transcriptome analysis. (B) Strategy for selective amplification and sequencing of successful on-target knock-in DNA construct barcodes. A short region of DNA mismatches is introduced into one homology arm of the HDR templates. The on-target HDR knock-ins that have both primer binding sites will be selectively amplified from genomic DNA (gDNA) or cDNA (Figures S2A). (C) Percent of amplicon sequencing reads with GFP or RFP barcodes in the indicated sorted populations 7 days after pooled knock-in of a barcoded two-member library with each construct encoding the same TCR specificity (NY-ESO-1 1G4 clone) plus a distinct additional insert (GFP or RFP) and corresponding DNA barcode. (D) Calculation of knock-in multiplicity in individual cells based on dual GFP / RFP 2-member library knock-in experiments (Figure S2C–E). The predicted percentage (right) of cells with biallelic integrations is estimated to be twice the observed percentage (left) of dual GFP+RFP+ cells as GFP+GFP+ and RFP+RFP+ biallelic cells would be observed in single positive gates. (E) Quantification of template switching in pooled knock-in experiments. The frequency of template switching at each stage of the protocol (left panel) was estimated by sorting single positive populations of T cells edited with the 2-member barcoded library (NY-ESO-1 TCR+GFP and NY-ESO-1 TCR+RFP) and using the homology arm mismatch priming strategy to selectively amplify the barcodes of on-target integrations. The predicted frequency of template switching in an arbitrarily large N-member library (N>2) can be calculated from the observed template switching for a 2-member library (STAR Methods). The pooled electroporation condition (bold) was used for subsequent pooled knock-in screens. n=2 (C–E) individual healthy human donors. See also Figure S1–S2 and Table S1

Article Snippet: The 36 constructs included in the pooled knock-in library ( Table S1 ) were designed using the Benchling DNA sequence editor, commercially synthesized as a dsDNA geneblock (IDT), and individually cloned using Gibson Assemblies into a pUC19 plasmid containing the NY-ESO-1 TCR replacement HDR sequence (except for pooled assembly conditions, whereas all geneblocks in the library were pooled prior to assembly).

Techniques: Ex Vivo, In Vivo, Amplification, Sequencing, Knock-In, Construct, Binding Assay, Electroporation